• Post category:close sst
  • Reading time:2 mins read

Reference Material:

IT seems to me that architecture is very much something that causes us both pleasure and trouble. I live in the part of western London where I think many of the streets are, where I live are really really ugly, and this distresses me every time I walk to a supermarket or walk to a tube. I think why did they built that and with terribly without architecture. It last so long, and if you write a bad book or do a bad play, you know, I will be shocked when it be showed and then no one would suffer. A bad building has a serious impact for, could be hundreds of years on the people around it.

And suppose the book arose a little bit from the frustration, almost anger than there is so much bad architecture around. And then I realize if you talk about architecture, you will say why building are not more beautiful. Then you will say I can use such work as “beauty”, that’s really arrogant word. And no one knows what beautiful is. It’s all in the eye of beholder. I couldn’t help but think that actually. Well, you know that we all attempt to agree that Rome is nice than Milkykings, and  San Francisco has the edge of Frankfurt, so we can make that sort of generalization, surely they are somethings we can say about why a building work or why it doesn’t. So the books really attempt to suggest why architecture works when it does and what might going to be wrong when it doesn’t work.

 

Sample Answer:

Architecture can cause us both pleasure and trouble, but the buildings in West London were really ugly without architecture. A bad building has a serious impact on the people around it for hundred years. Although beauty is all in the eye of beholder, we can make a generalization on which most people agree on. This book suggests why beautiful architecture works and what impacts ugly ones might bring.(68 words)

 

For more real exam PTE questions and brand 9 answers, check out “All in One PTE Question Bank”